The Indian Supreme Court has rejected multiple petitions challenging the addition of the words "Socialist" and "Secular" in the Preamble of the Constitution. The Court, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, stated that the Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, including the Preamble. The Court also noted that secularism is a core feature of the Constitution and has been upheld in previous judgements. The petitions argue that the concept of "Dharma" and the failure of the Communist theory of state make the insertion inappropriate and that Indian citizens should not be compelled to be secular.
Supreme Court Upholds Parliament's Authority to Amend Constitution's Preamble
Background
The Preamble to the Constitution of India is a concise yet profound statement that sets forth the fundamental principles and aspirations of the Indian nation. Originally adopted in 1949, it has been amended several times over the years.
In 1976, during the Emergency period, the 42nd Amendment Act added the words "Socialist" and "Secular" to the Preamble. These additions aimed to reflect the nation's commitment to social justice and religious tolerance.
Recent Petition Challenges
In 2019, several petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the validity of the 42nd Amendment. The petitioners argued that the addition of the words "Socialist" and "Secular" was inappropriate and violated the basic structure of the Constitution.
Supreme Court's Decision
In June 2022, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, unanimously dismissed the petitions. The Court held that the Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution, including the Preamble. The Court also emphasized that secularism is a core value of the Constitution and has been consistently upheld by the judiciary.
Top 5 FAQs
1. What is the Preamble to the Constitution of India?
The Preamble is a brief statement that sets out the ideals and objectives of the Indian nation. It articulates the commitment to democracy, equality, liberty, and secularism.
2. When were the words "Socialist" and "Secular" added to the Preamble?
The words "Socialist" and "Secular" were added to the Preamble through the 42nd Amendment Act in 1976.
3. Why did the petitioners challenge the amendments?
The petitioners argued that the additions were inconsistent with the concept of "Dharma" and the failure of the Communist theory of state. They also claimed that citizens should not be compelled to be secular.
4. What did the Supreme Court rule?
The Supreme Court upheld the amendments, stating that the Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution. The Court also affirmed the importance of secularism as a core value.
5. What is the significance of the Supreme Court's decision?
The decision confirms the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution and reinforces the principle of secularism as a fundamental aspect of India's constitutional framework.
Former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Kerala BJP leader C Sadanandan Master, Delhi-based historian Meenakshi Jain and prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam have all been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Nikam is best known for his role as the special public prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, and his nomination has sparked debate among political circles. These four individuals join a growing list of prominent personalities appointed to the upper house of the Indian Parliament.
The proscribed rebel group ULFA-I has claimed that the Indian Army carried out a series of drone and missile attacks on their mobile camps along the Myanmar border. The attacks allegedly resulted in the death of several leaders, including the 'chairman' and 'brigadier' of the outfit, and injured many others. However, the Indian Army has denied any knowledge of such an operation. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also denied involvement of the state police and promised clarity on the situation later in the day.
President Droupadi Murmu has exercised her power under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to nominate four individuals to the Rajya Sabha, including prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam and former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla. The appointments were made to fill vacancies created by the retirement of previously nominated members. This move marks the President's recognition of individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service. Among the nominees are Ujjwal Nikam, known for his role as Special Public Prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, and Harsh Vardhan Shringla, who has held several key diplomatic assignments.
President Droupadi Murmu has nominated veteran public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam to the Rajya Sabha, recognizing his exceptional contributions to the Indian judicial system. With a career spanning over four decades, Nikam has established a respectable reputation for prosecuting high-profile criminal cases, particularly those involving terrorism and national security. His nomination is seen as a move to bring legal expertise and prosecutorial experience to the legislative domain, and Nikam is expected to contribute significantly to legal reforms and national security discussions in Parliament.
Former Indian Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla and historian Meenakshi Jain have been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of the Indian Parliament. Shringla, who has a distinguished career as a diplomat and served as India's foreign secretary, brings his unique perspectives to the Upper House, while Jain, who has been recognized for her work in history, education, and literature, will add valuable insights to parliamentary proceedings. Both nominees have been congratulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on their nomination, highlighting their expertise and contributions to their respective fields.
The Rajya Sabha is set to witness a major shake-up in 2026 with 75 seats up for election, including those of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda, and two key ministers from Uttar Pradesh. Maharashtra, Jharkhand, and Andhra Pradesh will also see significant changes with leaders like Sharad Pawar, Shibu Soren, and Sana Satish Babu retiring. The upcoming elections will have a significant impact on the composition of the Upper House.
Lord Neil Kinnock, former leader of the Labour Party, has suggested imposing a 2% tax on assets worth more than £10 million. This move could potentially provide the government with an estimated £10-11 billion in additional revenue. However, a No10 source has distanced the government from the idea, stating that Lord Kinnock was expressing his personal views. The call for a wealth tax comes amidst pressure on the Chancellor to balance the budget after U-turns on cuts to disability benefits and winter fuel payments.
The Indian President has made four nominations to the Rajya Sabha under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to fill vacancies left by retired members. These nominations include well-known Bharatiya Janata Party leader and advocate Ujjwal Nikam, who previously served as a special public prosecutor in high-profile cases. These fresh appointments are crucial for the Rajya Sabha to have diverse expertise and perspectives from individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service.
Amid the chaos surrounding the passage of the Republican tax bill, the fate of Mason General Hospital in Washington state hung in the balance. Providers are now bracing for the long-term effects of the "One Big Beautiful" bill, which could lead to millions of Americans losing their health insurance by 2034. With Washington expected to be among the hardest hit, experts warn of potential service cutbacks, layoffs, and even closure of hospitals. The devastating impacts will not only affect Medicaid beneficiaries, but also all Washingtonians' access to healthcare.
Karnataka has passed a controversial bill that seeks to curb the spread of fake news on social media, empowering a committee headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister to identify and penalize offenders. Social media users found guilty of posting "fake news" could face up to seven years in prison and a hefty fine of Rs 10 lakh. However, critics argue that the bill's vague and broad definitions of fake news and misinformation could lead to the suppression of free speech and artistic expression. This comes after a similar provision in the amended IT Rules 2021 was struck down by the Bombay High Court for lacking judicial oversight, raising concerns about government overreach.