The Supreme Court has dismissed a set of petitions demanding the elimination of "secular", "socialist" and "integrity" from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The court stated that after 44 years of their introduction in 1976 by the Indira Gandhi government, there is no genuine reason for challenging the Constitutional amendment. The petitioners, including Subramanian Swamy, argued that these words violate the basic structure of the Constitution, but the apex court disagreed and emphasized that parliament holds the power to amend it. The court also pointed out the delay in filing the petition and clarified that parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not constrained by the date of its adoption.
The Preamble to the Indian Constitution: A Matter of Debate
The Preamble to the Indian Constitution, adopted on November 26, 1949, is a declaration of the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people. It sets out the fundamental principles of the Indian state, including its sovereignty, democracy, republic, secularism, socialism, and justice.
The 1976 Amendment
In 1976, during the Emergency period, the Indira Gandhi government amended the Constitution to include the words "secular" and "socialist" in the Preamble. The amendment also substituted the word "integrity" for "sovereignty" in the phrase "Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic of India."
The Recent Petition
In 2020, a group of petitioners, including BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding the deletion of the words "secular," "socialist," and "integrity" from the Preamble. They argued that these words violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court's Decision
In August 2022, the Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, stating that after 44 years of their introduction, there was no genuine reason for challenging the constitutional amendment. The court noted that Parliament holds the power to amend the Constitution and emphasized that the amendment did not violate its basic structure.
Top 5 FAQs
1. What is the Preamble to the Indian Constitution?
The Preamble is a declaration of the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people and sets out the fundamental principles of the Indian state.
2. Why were the words "secular" and "socialist" added to the Preamble?
They were added in 1976 to reflect the government's commitment to socialism and secularism.
3. Why did the petitioners want to remove these words?
They argued that the words "secular" and "socialist" violate the basic structure of the Constitution and undermine the sovereignty of the Indian state.
4. What was the Supreme Court's reasoning for dismissing the petitions?
The court stated that after 44 years of their introduction, there was no genuine reason for challenging the amendment and that Parliament holds the power to amend the Constitution.
5. What are the implications of the Supreme Court's decision?
The decision upholds the validity of the 1976 amendment and confirms Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. It also suggests that the basic structure of the Constitution is not static and can evolve over time.
Following his party's disappointing performance in the recent Bihar Assembly election, politician Prashant Kishor has raised concerns about the voting results, stating that they did not align with the public sentiment he witnessed during his campaign. Despite this setback, Kishor remains determined to build a stronger political organization and continue engaging with the public in preparation for future elections. He also addressed criticisms of his role as an election strategist, reminding critics that one loss does not define his political future.
Indian government under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi has introduced four new labour codes aimed at protecting the rights and well-being of 40 crore workers across the country. Union Minister Mansukh Mandaviya has hailed the move as transformative and a major step towards ensuring the welfare of the workforce. The new codes bring in much-needed changes such as formalisation and transparency through appointment letters, and universal social security coverage for all workers including gig and platform workers.
In Uttar Pradesh's Lakhimpur Kheri, a police constable is in hot water for allegedly forging a court order to clear his name in an old case, with the intention of securing a promotion. The fabricated document surfaced during an internal investigation, prompting authorities to file a fresh case against the constable. This incident adds to the growing issue of corruption and misuse of power within the police force.
The Supreme Court has directed the formation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to conduct a fact-finding inquiry against Vantara, an animal rescue and rehabilitation center in Gujarat, following allegations of non-compliance with laws and acquisition of animals. The SIT, headed by former apex court judge J Chelameswar, will also look into reports of irregularities and complaints from NGOs and wildlife organizations. Vantara has assured full cooperation to the probe and reaffirmed their commitment to animal welfare.
The ongoing family feud within the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) continues to escalate as three more daughters of party patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav have left the family residence in Bihar's capital Patna. This comes just a day after another daughter, Rohini Acharya, publicly denounced the family and quit politics following the party's poor performance in the recent elections. Amidst allegations of insults and mistreatment, the saga continues to unfold within the Yadav family.
In a special lecture series in Bengaluru, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat emphasized on the Hindu identity as a responsible and proud son of Bharat Mata. He urged the Hindu society to come together and share the message of 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam' with the rest of the world. Bhagwat also recalled the RSS founder and its journey of facing opposition and growth through dedication and sacrifice of its volunteers.
As the West Bengal Assembly elections near, the political battle between Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Trinamool Congress (TMC) has intensified on social media. Following the BJP's victory in Bihar, the party declared its hopes to defeat TMC in Bengal on a popular platform, while TMC leader Kunal Ghosh responded with a proverb highlighting the BJP's potential failure in Bengal. Despite BJP's confidence, TMC remains unfazed and asserts their strong hold in the state.
Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, was criticized by BJP's Shehzad Poonawalla for going on a jungle safari in Madhya Pradesh's Satpura Tiger Reserve instead of focusing on the ongoing Bihar elections. Gandhi had earlier claimed that "vote theft" had taken place in several states, including Madhya Pradesh. BJP's Poonawalla mocked Gandhi's "priorities" and referred to him as the "Leader of Paryatan and partying."
The sudden blast in Delhi that left several people dead has shocked everyone, including Bollywood stars Raveena Tandon, Thalapathy Vijay, Vineet Kumar Singh, and Riddhima Kapoor Sahni. While police are investigating all possible angles, including a terrorist conspiracy, Raveena's comments on social media suggest a link to terrorist activity. The celebrities also expressed their condolences to the victims and their families.
In a historic move, the Madhya Pradesh government has announced that it will be releasing 32 prisoners, including nine from tribal communities, on November 15 to mark Janjatiya Gaurav Diwas or Tribal Pride Day. This decision, initiated by Governor Mangubhai C Patel, aims to recognize and celebrate the contributions of tribal communities on the birth anniversary of their icon, Birsa Munda. This is the first time in India that prisoners will be released on grounds of good conduct while serving jail terms. However, it should be noted that the release will not apply to convicts in cases of rape or the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO), as well as those convicted in multiple murder cases.