The Supreme Court has dismissed a set of petitions demanding the elimination of "secular", "socialist" and "integrity" from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The court stated that after 44 years of their introduction in 1976 by the Indira Gandhi government, there is no genuine reason for challenging the Constitutional amendment. The petitioners, including Subramanian Swamy, argued that these words violate the basic structure of the Constitution, but the apex court disagreed and emphasized that parliament holds the power to amend it. The court also pointed out the delay in filing the petition and clarified that parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not constrained by the date of its adoption.
The Preamble to the Indian Constitution: A Matter of Debate
The Preamble to the Indian Constitution, adopted on November 26, 1949, is a declaration of the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people. It sets out the fundamental principles of the Indian state, including its sovereignty, democracy, republic, secularism, socialism, and justice.
The 1976 Amendment
In 1976, during the Emergency period, the Indira Gandhi government amended the Constitution to include the words "secular" and "socialist" in the Preamble. The amendment also substituted the word "integrity" for "sovereignty" in the phrase "Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic of India."
The Recent Petition
In 2020, a group of petitioners, including BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, filed a petition in the Supreme Court demanding the deletion of the words "secular," "socialist," and "integrity" from the Preamble. They argued that these words violate the basic structure of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court's Decision
In August 2022, the Supreme Court dismissed the petitions, stating that after 44 years of their introduction, there was no genuine reason for challenging the constitutional amendment. The court noted that Parliament holds the power to amend the Constitution and emphasized that the amendment did not violate its basic structure.
Top 5 FAQs
1. What is the Preamble to the Indian Constitution?
The Preamble is a declaration of the ideals and aspirations of the Indian people and sets out the fundamental principles of the Indian state.
2. Why were the words "secular" and "socialist" added to the Preamble?
They were added in 1976 to reflect the government's commitment to socialism and secularism.
3. Why did the petitioners want to remove these words?
They argued that the words "secular" and "socialist" violate the basic structure of the Constitution and undermine the sovereignty of the Indian state.
4. What was the Supreme Court's reasoning for dismissing the petitions?
The court stated that after 44 years of their introduction, there was no genuine reason for challenging the amendment and that Parliament holds the power to amend the Constitution.
5. What are the implications of the Supreme Court's decision?
The decision upholds the validity of the 1976 amendment and confirms Parliament's power to amend the Constitution. It also suggests that the basic structure of the Constitution is not static and can evolve over time.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, along with his sister Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and other senior party leaders, were stopped at the Ghazipur border while trying to enter Sambhal where prohibitory orders are currently in place. Heavy police force and barricades were put up in an attempt to prevent their entry into the district. This development comes amidst ongoing tensions and protests in the region over a controversial citizenship law.
SAD leader Sukhbir Singh Badal was attacked while performing 'seva' at the Golden Temple, but his party has stated that he will continue his duties as a religious punishment. The shooter has been identified as Narain Singh Chaura, a former militant who was arrested in 2013. Badal, who is in a wheelchair due to a fractured leg, has been serving his punishment at the temple entrance while holding a spear. Chaura has a history of involvement in illegal activities and was acquitted in a previous case.
Former Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) chief Sukhbir Singh Badal narrowly escaped injury when an attacker shot at him during his duty as a guardian at the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The attacker was identified as Narain Singh and was quickly overpowered by bystanders. The motive behind the attack remains unclear. Security arrangements at the temple were noted by Amritsar Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (ADCP) Harpal Singh, who confirmed that the attacker had been present the previous day and had paid homage before the attack. Former Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal and SAD leader Daljit Singh Cheema arrived at the scene after the incident occurred, with Cheema condemning it as a "big conspiracy" to destabilize Punjab.
A man identified as former Babbar Khalsa International terrorist Narain Singh Chaura attempted to shoot Sukhbir Singh Badal, a leader of the Shiromani Akali Dal, at the entrance of the Golden Temple in Amritsar on Tuesday. However, due to the quick reflexes and actions of an unknown man wearing an orange turban, the bullet was prevented from being fired, and Chaura was overpowered and arrested by the crowd. Badal, who was serving a religious punishment at the temple's entrance, was unharmed.
After announcing a surprise martial law order, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol faces pushback from MPs who quickly gathered at the National Assembly and voted to block his move. Demonstrators also gathered outside parliament to protest the sudden military rule. Less than two hours after his declaration, President Yoon reverses course, with some attributing the decision to his controversial and weakened position as a lame duck president. In response, the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions has called for nationwide strikes until Yoon resigns, labeling his actions as a "crime of insurrection."
On December 3, 2024, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law across the nation. This drastic measure, the first in nearly 50 years, was justified by the government as necessary to protect democracy and public safety. The announcement, made at 10 p.m. local time, came amid a political turmoil stemming from opposition parties' recent election victory and subsequent legislative deadlock. The official declaration outlined strict measures, including banning all political activities and placing media outlets under martial law control. Violators will face severe penalties as outlined in the Martial Law Act. Stay informed with the latest developments by subscribing to NewsX.
T Harish Rao, a popular grassroots leader and former minister from the ruling Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) party in Telangana, has found himself embroiled in a major political controversy as he was booked in a case of alleged illegal phone tapping. The case has caused a stir in the state's political landscape, particularly due to Rao's close ties to party chief and former Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao. The incident has sparked widespread debates and discussions about the ethics and legality of phone tapping in politics.
In response to the sudden declaration of emergency martial law in South Korea and the subsequent control near the president's office, the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) has announced an indefinite general strike. The strike, which will begin at 9 a.m. at Gwanghwamun, is a massive show of defiance against the government's actions. The White House has also stated that they were not notified in advance of the martial law declaration, adding further tension to the already volatile situation. Meanwhile, singer Park Hyo-shin has announced his highly anticipated return with a new album after a hiatus of 5 years.
The West Bengal Assembly passed a resolution urging the withdrawal of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 in Parliament. BJP legislators staged a walkout during the discussion on the resolution, opposing it. Minister Sovandeb Chattopadhyay, who moved the resolution, stated that the bill, if passed, will have a negative impact on Waqf administration in the country. However, Leader of Opposition Suvendu Adhikari argued that the resolution was a waste of time as a Joint Parliamentary Committee had been formed to examine the bill, and its term has been extended till 2025.
President Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law in South Korea has caused widespread concern, with the military taking over civilian government and suspending basic civil liberties. The president has cited the opposition's supposed ties to North Korea and their obstruction of government affairs as the reason for this extreme measure. However, many are questioning the motives behind this move, with concerns of a political power grab and potential abuse of power.