In a shocking incident, a Muslim woman was refused food at a charity stall near Tata Hospital in Mumbai for not chanting 'Jai Shri Ram'. The incident, which was recorded on camera, went viral on social media and sparked outrage among netizens. While some criticized the man and the NGO for their behavior, others questioned the meaning of Hinduism and the values it stands for. The second part of the video shows bystanders confirming the food distributor's statement, while a hospital staff member speaks out against such discriminatory rules.
Rising Tensions: Denial of Food to Muslim Woman at Charity Stall over 'Jai Shri Ram' Chant
In a disturbing incident, a Muslim woman in Mumbai was denied food at a charity stall near Tata Hospital for refusing to chant 'Jai Shri Ram.' The incident, captured on video, sparked widespread outrage and reignited debates about religious intolerance in India.
Background
The incident occurred on March 19, 2023, at a charity stall run by an NGO near Tata Hospital. The food distributor, identified as Ajay Rane, reportedly asked the woman to chant 'Jai Shri Ram,' a Hindu religious slogan, before providing her with food. The woman refused, citing her religious beliefs, and was subsequently denied food.
Outrage and Condemnation
The incident was widely condemned by netizens and social activists. Many criticized the man and the NGO for their discriminatory behavior, highlighting the violation of the woman's right to food and religious freedom. Some questioned the meaning of Hinduism and the values it stands for, while others urged the authorities to take action against those responsible.
Official Response
Following the viral video, the Maharashtra State Minorities Commission summoned Ajay Rane and the NGO to provide an explanation. Rane reportedly apologized for his actions and the NGO promised to take appropriate action to prevent such incidents in the future. The Mumbai Police also registered a case against Rane under the Hate Speech law.
FAQs
Q1: Why was the woman denied food? A1: The woman was denied food because she refused to chant 'Jai Shri Ram,' a Hindu religious slogan.
Q2: What legal implications could the man and the NGO face? A2: The man and the NGO could face charges under the Hate Speech law and other relevant provisions of law for discrimination and violation of religious freedom.
Q3: What is the significance of the 'Jai Shri Ram' chant? A3: 'Jai Shri Ram' is a religious slogan that has been used to promote Hinduism and Hindu nationalism in recent years.
Q4: Has there been a history of religious intolerance in India? A4: Yes, there have been several incidents of religious intolerance in India, including attacks on minority communities and the destruction of religious symbols.
Q5: What steps can be taken to promote religious tolerance? A5: To promote religious tolerance, it is important to educate people about the importance of respecting different faiths, promoting dialogue between different religious communities, and implementing laws that protect the rights of all citizens regardless of their religious beliefs.
Former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Kerala BJP leader C Sadanandan Master, Delhi-based historian Meenakshi Jain and prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam have all been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Nikam is best known for his role as the special public prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, and his nomination has sparked debate among political circles. These four individuals join a growing list of prominent personalities appointed to the upper house of the Indian Parliament.
The proscribed rebel group ULFA-I has claimed that the Indian Army carried out a series of drone and missile attacks on their mobile camps along the Myanmar border. The attacks allegedly resulted in the death of several leaders, including the 'chairman' and 'brigadier' of the outfit, and injured many others. However, the Indian Army has denied any knowledge of such an operation. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also denied involvement of the state police and promised clarity on the situation later in the day.
President Droupadi Murmu has exercised her power under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to nominate four individuals to the Rajya Sabha, including prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam and former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla. The appointments were made to fill vacancies created by the retirement of previously nominated members. This move marks the President's recognition of individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service. Among the nominees are Ujjwal Nikam, known for his role as Special Public Prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, and Harsh Vardhan Shringla, who has held several key diplomatic assignments.
President Droupadi Murmu has nominated veteran public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam to the Rajya Sabha, recognizing his exceptional contributions to the Indian judicial system. With a career spanning over four decades, Nikam has established a respectable reputation for prosecuting high-profile criminal cases, particularly those involving terrorism and national security. His nomination is seen as a move to bring legal expertise and prosecutorial experience to the legislative domain, and Nikam is expected to contribute significantly to legal reforms and national security discussions in Parliament.
Former Indian Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla and historian Meenakshi Jain have been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of the Indian Parliament. Shringla, who has a distinguished career as a diplomat and served as India's foreign secretary, brings his unique perspectives to the Upper House, while Jain, who has been recognized for her work in history, education, and literature, will add valuable insights to parliamentary proceedings. Both nominees have been congratulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on their nomination, highlighting their expertise and contributions to their respective fields.
The Rajya Sabha is set to witness a major shake-up in 2026 with 75 seats up for election, including those of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda, and two key ministers from Uttar Pradesh. Maharashtra, Jharkhand, and Andhra Pradesh will also see significant changes with leaders like Sharad Pawar, Shibu Soren, and Sana Satish Babu retiring. The upcoming elections will have a significant impact on the composition of the Upper House.
Lord Neil Kinnock, former leader of the Labour Party, has suggested imposing a 2% tax on assets worth more than £10 million. This move could potentially provide the government with an estimated £10-11 billion in additional revenue. However, a No10 source has distanced the government from the idea, stating that Lord Kinnock was expressing his personal views. The call for a wealth tax comes amidst pressure on the Chancellor to balance the budget after U-turns on cuts to disability benefits and winter fuel payments.
The Indian President has made four nominations to the Rajya Sabha under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to fill vacancies left by retired members. These nominations include well-known Bharatiya Janata Party leader and advocate Ujjwal Nikam, who previously served as a special public prosecutor in high-profile cases. These fresh appointments are crucial for the Rajya Sabha to have diverse expertise and perspectives from individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service.
Amid the chaos surrounding the passage of the Republican tax bill, the fate of Mason General Hospital in Washington state hung in the balance. Providers are now bracing for the long-term effects of the "One Big Beautiful" bill, which could lead to millions of Americans losing their health insurance by 2034. With Washington expected to be among the hardest hit, experts warn of potential service cutbacks, layoffs, and even closure of hospitals. The devastating impacts will not only affect Medicaid beneficiaries, but also all Washingtonians' access to healthcare.
Karnataka has passed a controversial bill that seeks to curb the spread of fake news on social media, empowering a committee headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister to identify and penalize offenders. Social media users found guilty of posting "fake news" could face up to seven years in prison and a hefty fine of Rs 10 lakh. However, critics argue that the bill's vague and broad definitions of fake news and misinformation could lead to the suppression of free speech and artistic expression. This comes after a similar provision in the amended IT Rules 2021 was struck down by the Bombay High Court for lacking judicial oversight, raising concerns about government overreach.