After facing criticism from the Delhi High Court, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government appears to be reconsidering their refusal to implement the Ayushman Bharat insurance scheme initiated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This comes after BJP MPs filed a plea in the court seeking implementation of the scheme in Delhi, while other states have already adopted it. The scheme, which was recently expanded to cover all individuals over 70, has been hailed as a crucial step towards providing universal healthcare, but political reasons have caused delay in its adoption in Delhi and West Bengal.
Ayushman Bharat Scheme: AAP Reconsiders Implementation After HC Criticism
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Delhi is reportedly reconsidering its refusal to implement the Ayushman Bharat insurance scheme after facing criticism from the Delhi High Court.
Background
Ayushman Bharat, also known as Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), is a flagship healthcare initiative launched by the Modi government in 2018. It aims to provide health coverage to over 500 million poor and vulnerable Indians.
The scheme covers a wide range of medical expenses, including hospitalization, surgeries, and diagnostic tests. It is funded by both the central and state governments.
Delhi's Stand
Initially, the AAP government in Delhi had declined to implement Ayushman Bharat, citing concerns about the scheme's sustainability and the alleged lack of coordination with the central government.
Criticism and Legal Challenges
However, the government faced criticism from various quarters, including health experts and opposition parties. Several BJP MPs filed a plea in the Delhi High Court challenging the government's decision.
The court, in its recent hearing, expressed its displeasure with the government's stance, stating that the scheme had the potential to benefit millions of people in Delhi.
AAP's Reconsideration
Faced with pressure from the court and public opinion, the AAP government now appears to be reassessing its position. Sources within the party have hinted that they are willing to consider implementing the scheme with certain modifications.
Top 5 FAQs
1. What is the Ayushman Bharat scheme?
Ayushman Bharat is a health insurance scheme that provides coverage for medical expenses to poor and vulnerable Indians.
2. Why has the AAP government initially refused to implement it?
The AAP government had concerns about the scheme's sustainability and alleged lack of coordination with the central government.
3. What prompted the AAP government to reconsider?
Criticism from the Delhi High Court and public pressure forced the government to reassess its decision.
4. What are the benefits of the scheme?
The scheme covers a wide range of medical expenses, including hospitalization, surgeries, and diagnostic tests.
5. Will the AAP government implement the scheme as it is?
Sources within the party have hinted that they may make certain modifications before implementing it.
India's top court is currently hearing petitions challenging a 1991 law that aims to preserve the character and identity of religious places of worship as they existed on the country's independence in 1947. The law has been a subject of controversy due to its impact on the dispute over the Babri Masjid, which was demolished in 1992. While some argue that the law infringes on religious freedom and secularism, others defend it as crucial in safeguarding the places of worship of religious minorities in a predominantly Hindu country. The court's decision on the issue, expected in February, could have wider implications for religious tensions in India.
A Kolkata court has granted bail to the accused in the rape and murder case of a resident doctor, as the CBI failed to file charges within the 90-day period. The accused, former Principal Sandip Ghosh, still faces charges concerning financial irregularities at the medical college. The High Court has also ordered a probe into the alleged mishandling of key evidence by Ghosh. This comes after backlash over his resignation and immediate appointment as Principal of another college.
The two-day Constitution debate in Lok Sabha, as part of the Parliament's winter session, saw heated discussions between the ruling and opposition parties. With the 75th anniversary of India's Constitution adoption as the backdrop, top leaders from BJP and Congress sparred over constitutional matters. In other news, BJP's nominee Rekha Sharma was elected unopposed in the Rajya Sabha by-election from Haryana, with a promise to empower women.
India's External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, addressed President-elect Donald Trump's recent statement about imposing tariffs on BRICS nations at the Doha Forum. Jaishankar emphasized the strong relationship between India and the US, particularly during Trump's first administration, and the revival of the QUAD alliance. He also emphasized the positive personal bond between Prime Minister Modi and Trump, and India's stance against de-dollarization. Jaishankar reiterated the importance of the US-India trade partnership and stated that there are no plans for a BRICS currency.
In a significant development, the Supreme Court granted bail to former Rajasthan MLA Giriraj Singh Malinga, who was accused of brutally attacking a Dalit engineer. Malinga, who was a Congress leader at the time of the incident but is now in the ruling BJP, surrendered following the SC's orders. The court has kept his Special Leave Petition pending and scheduled it for further hearing after his surrender. The accused had allegedly abused the engineer and caused him physical harm over a disagreement related to his constituency. The case has sparked controversy, with the state opposing Malinga's bail and the complainant citing concerns of intimidation and influence on public opinion.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has kickstarted the preparations for Mahakumbh 2025 by inaugurating various developmental projects worth Rs. 5,500 crore in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. These projects, including new roads, flyovers, ghats, and riverfront roads, aim to improve connectivity and provide better amenities for the expected influx of devotees during the event. Additionally, Modi also launched initiatives to clean the Ganga by intercepting, diverting, and treating drains that currently lead untreated water into the sacred river, fulfilling his vision for a "Swachh and Nirmal Ganga."
Following the tragic death of 34-year-old Atul Subhash, his father has come forward claiming that his son was driven to suicide due to ongoing disputes and corruption in the justice system. Atul's wife had filed multiple cases against him and his family, resulting in immense stress and turmoil. The deceased's brother also spoke out, alleging false cases and seeking action against those who mentally tortured his brother. This incident has sparked a larger conversation about how laws and provisions meant to empower women are being misused.
Mamata Banerjee's recent actions in promoting the fast-tracking of the Jagannath temple project in Digha, as well as her decision to select an ISKCON official to be a part of the temple's trustees, have caused outrage and criticism from opposition parties. This move by the West Bengal Chief Minister has sparked a heated political controversy, as some accuse her of using religious sentiments for political gain.
Eluru MP Putta Mahesh Kumar has urged Union Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw to take action on several railway-related issues in the Eluru parliamentary constituency. These include the sanctioning of a new 96 km railway line connecting Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, modernization of Nuzvid railway station, and approval of a broad-gauge line via Sathupalli to connect Bhadrachalam and Kovvur. The MP highlighted the economic benefits of these projects, calling for their inclusion in the Union Budget 2025 and addressing rising construction costs due to delays. Additionally, he proposed halts for several express and passenger trains at various stations in the constituency to facilitate easy travel for pilgrims and boost the local economy.
The Indian government is pushing for simultaneous national and state elections by proposing two new articles, which could be put into effect as early as 2034. This timeline allows for proper planning and execution by the Election Commission, which would require up to three years to make necessary arrangements. However, according to EC sources, even this timeline may be cutting it too close. The proposed amendments also exclude any immediate plans for simultaneous local body elections, which would require further ratification and logistical considerations.