Over the years, the Indian Supreme Court has faced criticism for its increasing compliance with the government's actions, leading to perceptions of it as an illiberal institution. As the Chief Justice, Chandrachud, who was once praised for his progressive and liberal values, has not lived up to the expectations of being assertive and independent. The court's handling of politically sensitive cases, such as Article 370, the Babri Masjid dispute, and bail, has tarnished Chandrachud's previous reputation and overshadowed his earlier standing as a liberal judge. Additionally, a shocking revelation from Justice Chandrachud himself has raised concerns about the court's impartiality in the controversial Ayodhya dispute.
In recent years, the Indian Supreme Court has faced criticism for its perceived compliance with the government's actions, leading to concerns about its independence and impartiality. This issue has come to the forefront under the leadership of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, who was once praised for his progressive and liberal values.
Chief Justice Chandrachud was appointed to the Supreme Court in 2016 and became its Chief Justice in November 2022. Prior to his appointment, he served as a judge in the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court. He was known for his liberal rulings on issues such as LGBTQ+ rights and constitutional freedoms.
Critics have accused the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Chandrachud of being overly compliant with the government, particularly in politically sensitive cases. For example, the court's handling of the following issues has drawn criticism:
In addition to allegations of compliance, the revelation by Chief Justice Chandrachud that he had met with a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) official in the wake of the Ayodhya dispute has raised concerns about the court's impartiality. Justice Chandrachud claimed that the meeting was a coincidence, but critics have questioned whether it compromised the court's neutrality in the case.
The alleged compliance and impartiality concerns have tarnished Chief Justice Chandrachud's previous reputation as a liberal judge. Critics claim that he has not lived up to expectations of being assertive and independent.
1. Why is there criticism of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Chandrachud? Answer: The Supreme Court is criticized for its perceived compliance with the government's actions in politically sensitive cases.
2. What are some examples of cases where the Supreme Court's handling has been questioned? Answer: Examples include the Article 370 revocation, the Babri Masjid dispute, and the granting of bail to political figures.
3. What is the concern about Chief Justice Chandrachud's meeting with a BJP official? Answer: Critics question whether the meeting compromised the court's impartiality in the Ayodhya dispute.
4. How has Chief Justice Chandrachud's reputation been affected by these allegations? Answer: His reputation as a liberal judge has been tarnished, and he is seen as not being assertive or independent enough.
5. What is the future outlook for the Supreme Court's independence? Answer: The Supreme Court's independence is being tested, and it remains to be seen whether it can maintain its neutrality and safeguard constitutional rights in the face of government pressure.
Amidst the ongoing controversy over the assault of a shopkeeper by MNS workers, Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde caused a stir with his concluding speech at an event in Pune, where he raised the slogans "Jai Gujarat" and "Jai Maharashtra". While the opposition accused Shinde of being "greedy for power", CM Devendra Fadnavis defended him, stating that it was a customary practice to hail the state where an event is being held. The incident adds fuel to the ongoing debate on Marathi language and pride, ahead of the civic elections in Maharashtra.
At a recent political event, Indian Union minister Amit Shah addressed the crowd in Gujarati language, highlighting the importance of connecting with regional languages in India. Maharashtra politician Eknath Shinde also addressed the gathering, exclaiming "Jai Hind, Jai Maharashtra, Jai Gujarat." The event served as a platform for politicians to express their opinions and connect with their audiences in regional languages, showcasing the diverse cultural and linguistic landscape of the country.
In an effort to prevent the division of secular votes and counter communal forces, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) has expressed its willingness to join the Mahagathbandhan in Bihar ahead of the 2025 assembly elections. The party's letter to RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav highlights their intention and also mentions previous failed attempts. The party has also conveyed this to other senior leaders of RJD, including Tejashwi Yadav, with the hope to “contest the Bihar assembly elections together."
On the occasion of the 100th birth anniversary of revered Jain spiritual leader Acharya Vidyanand Ji Maharaj, Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the inaugural ceremony of the year-long centenary celebrations. In his speech, PM Modi highlighted the eternal nature of Indian civilization and praised Acharya Vidyanand Ji Maharaj as a symbol of this timeless philosophy. The event served as a reminder of the rich spiritual and cultural heritage of India.
The Indian Prime Minister, currently on a five-nation tour, took to social media to pay homage to Swami Vivekananda on the revered monk's death anniversary. PM Modi highlighted Swami Vivekananda's enduring influence on Indian society and his emphasis on serving others and embracing India's rich heritage. Even after a century since his passing, Swami Vivekananda's teachings continue to inspire generations, promoting unity and compassion in a divided world.
In the midst of a controversial video surfacing showing a shopkeeper being assaulted for not speaking Marathi, Maharashtra Minister Yogesh Kadam spoke out in defense of the state's official language and condemned acts of vigilantism. The incident has sparked a larger debate over linguistic identity and regional pride in Maharashtra. While emphasizing the importance of cultural and linguistic respect, Kadam also denounced the manner in which the situation escalated and called for individuals to not take the law into their own hands. A police investigation is currently ongoing.
Karnataka, known for its thriving tech industry, is proposing a bill that aims to address the spread of fake news and misinformation online. However, free speech activists are raising concerns about potential censorship and selective enforcement. The bill has not yet defined what constitutes as "fake news" or "anti-feminist" content, raising fears of potential misuse. The state government has stated that the bill will be open for public opinion before implementation.
Pope Leo XIV took time out of his busy schedule to visit children at the Vatican's summer camp and share some inspirational words. He emphasized themes of diversity, acceptance, and building bridges of friendship. The pontiff also encouraged the children to be advocates for peace and to see everyone as equals.
At the Saryu Jayanti Mahotsav in Ayodhya, CM Yogi Adityanath announced a plan to revive rivers by preventing sewage, drain discharge, and animal waste. He stressed the importance of rivers for the environment and agriculture and highlighted the economic benefits of clean rivers for tourism and local economies. The CM urged all stakeholders to work together to ensure the success of this initiative, emphasizing the link between river health and the well-being of communities.
The cyber crime division of Bengaluru South has registered a case against Ateeq Shariff and the administrator of 'Mangalore Muslims' for posting derogatory content against one of the judges of the Karnataka High Court hearing the hijab case. The judge in question is part of a three-judge bench formed after Muslim girls were denied entry to college for wearing hijab. This comes amidst tension and communal strife over the government order banning certain clothing on educational campuses.