In a united front, legislators from various parties in Jammu and Kashmir, including the Awami Ittehad Party, Peoples Democratic Party, and J&K Peoples Conference, have moved a resolution against the Centre's decision to revoke Article 370 and 35A. They label the move as "unconstitutional and unilateral" and call for the immediate restoration of the articles in their original form, along with the reversal of changes introduced by the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. The leaders urge the Union government to preserve the region's distinct identity, culture, and political autonomy, respecting its democratic and constitutional sanctity.
Revocation of Article 370 and Its Impact on Jammu and Kashmir: A Comprehensive Overview
Background
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution was a special provision that granted the state of Jammu and Kashmir a unique status within the Indian union. It allowed the state to have its own constitution, flag, and autonomous administration. The article was incorporated into the constitution in 1949, as part of the agreement between the Indian government and the state's leaders.
Revocation of Article 370
On August 5, 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370 and Article 35A of the constitution, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir. The move was met with widespread protests and criticism, both within and outside the state.
The government's justification for the revocation was that it would help to integrate Jammu and Kashmir more fully into the Indian union, and to promote economic development and security in the state. However, critics argued that the move was unconstitutional and undemocratic, and that it would undermine the unique identity and autonomy of the state.
Impact on Jammu and Kashmir
The revocation of Article 370 has had a significant impact on Jammu and Kashmir. The state has been under a virtual lockdown since August 5, 2019, with restrictions on movement, communication, and assembly. Thousands of people have been arrested, and there have been reports of human rights violations.
The economic impact of the revocation has also been severe. The tourism industry has been decimated, and many businesses have been forced to close. Unemployment and poverty levels have increased, and the region is facing a humanitarian crisis.
Political Consequences
The revocation of Article 370 has also had a profound political impact. The move has deepened the alienation of the Kashmiri people, and has led to increased support for separatism. Several political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have condemned the move, and have called for the restoration of the state's special status.
The revocation has also strained relations between India and Pakistan. Pakistan has condemned the move, and has suspended diplomatic ties with India. The two countries have also exchanged fire across the border, raising fears of a wider conflict.
FAQs
1. Why was Article 370 revoked?
The Indian government's stated reason for revoking Article 370 was to integrate Jammu and Kashmir more fully into the Indian union, and to promote economic development and security in the state.
2. Is the revocation of Article 370 constitutional?
The legality of the revocation of Article 370 is currently being challenged in the Supreme Court of India. The court has yet to issue a ruling on the matter.
3. What has been the impact of the revocation on Jammu and Kashmir?
The revocation has had a devastating impact on Jammu and Kashmir. The state has been under a virtual lockdown since August 5, 2019, with restrictions on movement, communication, and assembly. Thousands of people have been arrested, and there have been reports of human rights violations. The economic impact has also been severe, with the tourism industry decimated and unemployment levels increasing.
4. What are the political consequences of the revocation?
The revocation has deepened the alienation of the Kashmiri people, and has led to increased support for separatism. Several political parties in Jammu and Kashmir have condemned the move, and have called for the restoration of the state's special status. The revocation has also strained relations between India and Pakistan.
5. What is the future of Jammu and Kashmir?
The future of Jammu and Kashmir is uncertain. The revocation of Article 370 has created a deep sense of grievance among the Kashmiri people, and it is unclear how the Indian government will reconcile these grievances with its goal of integrating the state more fully into the Indian union.
Former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Kerala BJP leader C Sadanandan Master, Delhi-based historian Meenakshi Jain and prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam have all been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Nikam is best known for his role as the special public prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, and his nomination has sparked debate among political circles. These four individuals join a growing list of prominent personalities appointed to the upper house of the Indian Parliament.
The proscribed rebel group ULFA-I has claimed that the Indian Army carried out a series of drone and missile attacks on their mobile camps along the Myanmar border. The attacks allegedly resulted in the death of several leaders, including the 'chairman' and 'brigadier' of the outfit, and injured many others. However, the Indian Army has denied any knowledge of such an operation. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also denied involvement of the state police and promised clarity on the situation later in the day.
President Droupadi Murmu has exercised her power under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to nominate four individuals to the Rajya Sabha, including prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam and former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla. The appointments were made to fill vacancies created by the retirement of previously nominated members. This move marks the President's recognition of individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service. Among the nominees are Ujjwal Nikam, known for his role as Special Public Prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, and Harsh Vardhan Shringla, who has held several key diplomatic assignments.
President Droupadi Murmu has nominated veteran public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam to the Rajya Sabha, recognizing his exceptional contributions to the Indian judicial system. With a career spanning over four decades, Nikam has established a respectable reputation for prosecuting high-profile criminal cases, particularly those involving terrorism and national security. His nomination is seen as a move to bring legal expertise and prosecutorial experience to the legislative domain, and Nikam is expected to contribute significantly to legal reforms and national security discussions in Parliament.
Former Indian Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla and historian Meenakshi Jain have been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of the Indian Parliament. Shringla, who has a distinguished career as a diplomat and served as India's foreign secretary, brings his unique perspectives to the Upper House, while Jain, who has been recognized for her work in history, education, and literature, will add valuable insights to parliamentary proceedings. Both nominees have been congratulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on their nomination, highlighting their expertise and contributions to their respective fields.
The Rajya Sabha is set to witness a major shake-up in 2026 with 75 seats up for election, including those of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda, and two key ministers from Uttar Pradesh. Maharashtra, Jharkhand, and Andhra Pradesh will also see significant changes with leaders like Sharad Pawar, Shibu Soren, and Sana Satish Babu retiring. The upcoming elections will have a significant impact on the composition of the Upper House.
Lord Neil Kinnock, former leader of the Labour Party, has suggested imposing a 2% tax on assets worth more than £10 million. This move could potentially provide the government with an estimated £10-11 billion in additional revenue. However, a No10 source has distanced the government from the idea, stating that Lord Kinnock was expressing his personal views. The call for a wealth tax comes amidst pressure on the Chancellor to balance the budget after U-turns on cuts to disability benefits and winter fuel payments.
The Indian President has made four nominations to the Rajya Sabha under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to fill vacancies left by retired members. These nominations include well-known Bharatiya Janata Party leader and advocate Ujjwal Nikam, who previously served as a special public prosecutor in high-profile cases. These fresh appointments are crucial for the Rajya Sabha to have diverse expertise and perspectives from individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service.
Amid the chaos surrounding the passage of the Republican tax bill, the fate of Mason General Hospital in Washington state hung in the balance. Providers are now bracing for the long-term effects of the "One Big Beautiful" bill, which could lead to millions of Americans losing their health insurance by 2034. With Washington expected to be among the hardest hit, experts warn of potential service cutbacks, layoffs, and even closure of hospitals. The devastating impacts will not only affect Medicaid beneficiaries, but also all Washingtonians' access to healthcare.
Karnataka has passed a controversial bill that seeks to curb the spread of fake news on social media, empowering a committee headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister to identify and penalize offenders. Social media users found guilty of posting "fake news" could face up to seven years in prison and a hefty fine of Rs 10 lakh. However, critics argue that the bill's vague and broad definitions of fake news and misinformation could lead to the suppression of free speech and artistic expression. This comes after a similar provision in the amended IT Rules 2021 was struck down by the Bombay High Court for lacking judicial oversight, raising concerns about government overreach.